May 28 2012

Closed for Business

Published by under Announcements,Mr. W

Sorry to say the year is over. I really enjoyed our time together. Best of luck to each of you in college and beyond!

If you have just stumbled upon this blog, note that our class no longer meets and will no longer be adding new content.  Feel free to click around and see all that we’ve learned about environmental science this year. -Mr. W

Print Friendly

One response so far

May 16 2012

It’s a Small World…

Published by under On My Mind,TateK

Since most of you have been at Providence Day for a while, I’m assuming you all remember Hunter Hodges, who left in 8th grade and moved to Beaufort, SC. Anywhosen, I came across this article that talked about how her parents established and currently operate a non-toxic insect repellent service. The substance used is natural and EPA approved as non-toxic, as it’s derived from cedars. Point is, check it out. Pretty neat-o.

 

http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20120514/PC05/120519565

Print Friendly

One response so far

May 10 2012

Turnips! But not really…

You guys remember those turnip seeds we were caring for at the beginning of the year? I won’t lie and say I took an fantastic job of taking care of them over the Winter holiday break….they died.

BUT! In my quest to try and rehabilitate the poor plants, with no avail, I put home-made compost into the cup to see if it would help.

If you can’t tell by now, it didn’t. But out of the compost grew another seed!

At first it seemed like just a random weed that I was taking time to water still, but it turns out it’s a tomato plant!

At least it smells  like one.

That should make sense to someone out there.

Anyways, the point of this post is to introduce the class to our class tomato plant!

Keep in mind, I won’t be expecting any tomatoes from it any time soon.

Print Friendly

2 responses so far

May 09 2012

APES in the News

Published by under Mr. W,On My Mind and tagged:

Well, you all made it. Now that the course and AP exam are behind you, I hope you pay attention to the environmental issues that lie before you. Here are just a few of the issues we have studied that have popped up in the news the last few weeks. Feel free to share things you come across with me here or by email.

Startup Converts Plastic to Oil, and Finds a Niche

Mutated Trout Raise New Concerns Near Mine Sites

How Do Your Salad Greens Get Contaminated? (yep, we are talking poop and fecal coliforms)

Damage to the World’s Oceans “To Reach $2 Trillion a Year”

Sea Change in Salinity Heralds Shift in Rainfall

U.S. Intelligence Sees Global Water Conflict Rising

Global Warming Close to Becoming Irreversible-Scientists

Government Proposes First Carbon Limits on Power Plants

Groups Seek Fuller Disclosure of Fracking in Wyoming

Warmest March on Record Across Half the U.S., Expert Says

How Green are Electric Cars? Depends on Where You Plug In

Rural Chinese Flock to Tiny Electric Cars

Entrepreneurs Find Cash in Trash

African Big Game Poaching Surges on Asian Affluence

and, sadly…

Lorax Statue Stolen from Dr. Suess Garden, Family Hopes for its Return

Now that the course is over, what do you think is our biggest environmental issue? Why?

 

Print Friendly

No responses yet

May 03 2012

Carbon Offsets: Solution or Scam?

So, while your text does introduce the concept of carbon neutral it did not mention carbon offsets, which have become a hot ticket in “climate change mitigation.” There are many companies out there now marketing carbon offsets to reduce your “carbon footprint.” Terrapass is a popular one. You can offset one year’s worth of air travel (an estimated 8,000 pounds of carbon emitted) for just $50.60 as of 5/5/2011. Your money goes to support wind farms and methane capture projects-that’s how the carbon is “offset.” Some companies will even plant trees to offset carbon produced by your lifestyle.

So, does this approach really mitigate global climate change or just encourage more “bad behavior” (burning of fossil fuels)? Watch this clever parody of carbon offsetting by a couple of Brits:

*If you want to learn more, visit www.cheatneutral.com

So, what do you think?

*Try www.carbonfootprint.com to for a carbon calculator if you want to assess how much carbon dioxide results from your lifestyle.

Print Friendly

No responses yet

Apr 30 2012

Air Pollution & Climate Change Mega-Post!

Since it is so close to the AP exam and all of you have fulfilled your scribe post obligations, I won’t start the list over. So, here is a collection of links from past classes on major air pollution issues and global climate change for those that missed class. While written a year or two ago, all the info is still correct and relevant:

Acid Rain

Ozone

Intro to Global Climate Change

Global Climate Change

Evidence and Consequences (of the Earth’s Warming)

Solutions to the Earth’s Warming Problem

Print Friendly

No responses yet

Apr 29 2012

Wrapping up emissions testing…

After testing a handful of vehicles in each class, we tried to analyze the class data for trends. It has become harder and harder to do as vehicle emissions have become so much “cleaner” over the last decade (yes, I said it). If we had the time, this is the data I would love to gather:

Relationship between CO2, CO, HC (Click to enlarge)

One reason vehicles emissions have improved so greatly in the USA, is catalytic converter technology. Catalytic converters speed reactions to reduce the amount of NOx, CO, and HC coming out of an automobile. Check out how catalytic converters work at howstuffworks.com.

Catalytic converters are pollution solutions!

Why does all this matter? Well, NOx have a key role in the formation of ground-level (tropospheric) ozone and photochemical smog. Reduce NOx (and CO and HC), and you reduce ground-level ozone and photochemical smog. You need to be familiar with both types of smog (below) on the AP exam.

Smog Types

Print Friendly

No responses yet

Apr 27 2012

Car Emissions 101 Scribe Post

*We won’t start the Scribe List over this late in the year, so since we are out of scribes here is a guest post by JamesS in the other class:

Monday we began talking about what exactly comes out of our cars, why they can be dangerous, and what the government is doing to curb these emissions.

We talked first about the Clean Air Act of 1970. This act allowed the E.P.A. through the NAAQS or the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

These standards were set on 6 “criteria” pollutants: NOx O3 SOx CO Lead and Particulates

The Actual Set Standards

We then focused on why there were standards set on these pollutants

Mr Williard's Highly Detailed and Highly Skilled Sketch

We divided the car emissions into two categories: regulated and non regulated.

Non Regulated

  • N2 is non regulated and not harmful, because it is relatively inert and passes through the car without any reaction
  • C02 is a warming gas that is created by reacting with C8H18 or Octane. It seems likely that there will be CO2 regulations in the future
  • H20 is also created in a reaction but is benign.

Regulated

  • CO= Very toxic
  • HC or hydrocarbon is an unburned fuel which is also known as a VOC or a Volatile Organic Compound
  • Particulates are what come from the exhaust to form Smoke or Smog
  • NOx is more dangerous as a secondary pollutant. When NOx combine with O2 due to high energy from temperature, creating O3 or Ozone.

Finally we talked about how the government can warn us about the quality of air at the current time through the Air Quality Index

AQI Index

Sources

http://www.blogmyair.com/uploaded_images/aqi-759020.JPG

http://www.intellectualtakeout.org/sites/www.intellectualtakeout.org/files/naaqs.jpg

Print Friendly

No responses yet

Apr 22 2012

EARTH DAY: Thought for the Day…

HAPPY EARTH DAY! Have you been good to your “mother?” You can see what others are doing around the country at the EPA website: http://www.epa.gov/earthday/

If you did notice lately, it is very “hip” to “green.” I’ve been watching my favorite NBC comedy shows lately, and seeing all these public service announcements for “green week.” Heck, even the NBC peacock logo is green! Check out NBC’s slick website (and the peacock): http://www.nbc.com/Green/

And, FOX is getting in on the act too. Check out their slick website: http://www.fox.com/greenitmeanit/

This type of public relations stuff is called “greenwashing.” Here’s a definition (can’t find or recall the source):

Greenwashing is the unjustified appropriation of environmental virtue by a company, an industry, a government, a politician or even a non-government organization to create a pro-environmental image, sell a product or a policy, or to try and rehabilitate their standing with the public and decision makers after being embroiled in controversy.

So, why is what NBC or Fox doing this week considered sorta sly? Well…do you think the network executives are doing it for the network or us (or both)? You decide.

If you want to know more, here are a few “watchdog” sites that monitor greenwashing:

Sourcewatch:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Greenwashing

Greenwashing.net

http://www.greenwashing.net/

Corpwatch:

http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=102

So, be a smart consumer, not all that is green is good. ANY group can claim to be green-there is no government standard! Love to discuss any of this with any of you here or in class one day…can you think of other examples you’ve seen?

Print Friendly

No responses yet

Apr 18 2012

Guest Speaker: Jim Thompson

*Note: This is a guest post by MattP from the other class.

Before Mr. Thompson, the CEO of a Biodiesel fuel company, came to speak to us on Friday, what did our class know about Biodiesel fuel or even just diesel fuel? We knew that diesel fuel was more expensive at gas stations than gasoline, that trucks and other large vehicles often run on diesel fuel, and that diesel fuel would destroy a gasoline engine. But that was about it.

The first thing Mr. Thompson want to make clear to us was that BIODIESEL IS NOT ETHANOL. Ethanol is a corn-based fuel that is made by distilling the sugars and starches into alcohol. It is then mixed with gasoline. Ethanol is not only less efficient than gasoline but it also takes away from our food supply. Basic rule of economics: when the supply of a product decreases the price increases. On top of its lack of efficiency and the fact that it increases the price of food, because it is corn-based all the same fossil fuel inputs and environmental impacts associated with farming. When you add up all these costs ethanol is energy negative (it takes more energy to make it than it provides) and in the eyes of Mr. Thompson and many others to be a bad fuel.

Mr. Thompson went on to explain what biodiesel fuel actually is and does. Biodiesel is fuel made from natural oils (soy, canola, poultry, algae, or Mr. Thompson’s company made fuel from used cooking oil) that can be used in a diesel engine. It can be combined with petroleum-based diesel fuel in any percentage and still run a diesel engine. In fact, the main reason biodiesel even needs to be mixed with petrodiesel fuel is that it tends to congeal when it is cold and block up engines. Petrodiesel’s lower freezing point prevents this tendency when the two are mixed. Compared to regular diesel fuel biodiesel fuel can also reduce carbon emissions by as much as 75%.


Biodiesel: 30 PSA

Just a couple of videos to show you how biodiesel fits into our country today

Mr. Thompson finished his lesson by telling us what biodiesel is not. Again IT IS NOT ETHANOL. It is not simply waste vegetable oil taken from someones kitchen and dumped into a gas tank. It has to be processed first or else it would eventually ruin your engine. On the downside, in most places it is not cheaper than regular diesel fuel or gasoline or available in as great quantities… yet. But on the upside it is not flammable, hazardous, carcinogenic, and since it is just natural oils, it biodegrades very quickly.

Biodiesel fuel has many exiting possibilities and in a few decades it could be one of our major sources of fuel.

Mr. Willard's picture

Print Friendly

No responses yet

Next »